New - How good is UltimateAQ.com as a help site?

[DarkForest]

So, how good do you think UltimateAQ.com is? Let us know.

Note: Outstanding is the highest rating. Rating decreases as the list goes down.

Note2: I recreated this poll since UAQ has changed alot since the last poll. I wanted fresh numbers.

[Kayf]

Pretty good. Didn't give it "outstanding" because I keep fumbling around the site. How the site works IS part of how it helps. >.>;

[Sano]

The site is great, just as I voted, and we all know that above all else, my vote counts. lol
Yeah I voted great, and great is what it is. Saying outstanding is...well...nothing is that great.

[Denzera]

Kayf - when you say "fumbling around the site", what do you mean? do you wish there more links? What could be made clearer?

We're always up for listening to people's problems with the site.

[Drago Goldenwing]

I'm gonna say 'Very good'.

I don't give it an 'Outstanding' for three reasons.
One is that the Encyclopedia used to get information up faster. This was before it was locked down. Now that it is locked down the information tends to pop up here at the same time it does there.
Another reason is that the information on Pets is harder to figure out here at UAQ. The Encyclopedia's information sets things out a lot more clearly. For example, (I'm making these stats up,)
At the Encyclopedia it would say:
"Attack 1: 4 hits Ranged Fire, 1-9, 50% chance, 0 BTH
Attack 2: 1 hit Melee Fire 4-36, 50% chance, 0 BTH"
Here at UAQ you get
"HITS: 4 hits - Fire or 1 hit - Fire
DAMAGE: 1-9
DMG TYPE: Ranged Ranged Ranged Ranged or Melee"
and no mention of the percentages on the attacks or the BTH, if any, of the attacks at all, and the Training Difficulty is blank on all of them. I wind up going to the Encyclopedia for Pet and Guest information because of this.

And I know I said there were three, but I forgot what the third one was. >_> When I think of it I'll post it.

[Luneth]

outsatnding

[Kayf]

One of the things that irks me a little is the set flash toolbar at the top. Some other people might not mind, but it leaves maybe 5/6ths of the main window where everything is and I like having all the room I can get for the page I'm viewing, ya know? Well, maybe you don't. >.>; The thing just sticks out like "WHOA" when I'm looking through info.

[Suikoman444]

If you want to get rid of it, right click a link -> Copy Link Location -> Post link in toolbar

And yeah, Drago, pets is on our to do list after monsters, armors and shield updates.

[Kayf]

Eh, yeah, but if I do, then I don't have the flash bar there so I can switch categories. Eh. I'll handle it.

EDIT: Oh, right. You're working on that new banner. Maybe that'll help.

[masterwower]

i would say very good/out standing. all my questions are always answered or helped sooner or later.

[Denzera]

Drago - the Pets (and Guests) confusion is a valid complaint. They're at the bottom of our list for pages to update, but they're on the list and we know it's unclear.

As for the speed of updates, the same guy who updates the Encyclopedia updates our data (Suikoman444), so he posts to both at the same time. We have the worldwide AQ data expert working for us, don't you worry

Thanks guys,

-D

[The Eclipse Massacre, Illidan]

Outstanding.I would've given you very good but now you filled in misc items so UAQ i knew you could finally make me speechless(not because of grossness but because of satisfaction)

[Bloody Death Flood]

Very good. If it was outstanding then it would update faster. That's the only nailbiter.

[Black Seraphim Zero]

I say OUTSTANDING. I've been here for a long time, even back in the day. Trust me, this site ROCKS.

[[MF]]

I'm going to give it a V-Good because some things can take days to get the stats on there when sometimes you don't have a lot of time to get them (ie. War Rewards)