|
|
Post by Dunit on May 17, 2007 17:05:51 GMT -5
Yep its almost here for the wii. Armaggedon(spelling?) that is.
You are supposed to be able to do moves with just simple moves like up-down, down-up, left-right, right-left, semicircle right, etc.....
It comes out the 29th of this month so wait and it shall be here in 12 days in the U.S. at least
|
|
|
|
Post by Über on May 17, 2007 17:08:03 GMT -5
..For real?
I never saw anything about it.
I need to get it.
>.>
|
|
|
|
Post by Dunit on May 17, 2007 17:09:51 GMT -5
Yeah its been confirmed by wikipedia I was looking up mortal kombat I went to armaggedon and in the first few lines it said coming for the wii may 29, 2007
It shall be soon and I can't wait already saved up my money for it and SSBB
|
|
|
|
Post by Faye on May 17, 2007 18:03:27 GMT -5
Armegeddon sux to me. Shaolin is fun for RPG. Deception and Dadly Alliance is kool. The only thing i like in Armegeddon is the custom character.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dunit on May 17, 2007 20:16:45 GMT -5
It has an rpg mode to and kreate-a-fatailty  Should be fun but I'll wait for some reviews |
|
|
|
Post by yogurtfresh on May 18, 2007 1:38:02 GMT -5
sick! i am so there. and the rpg for deadly alliance sucked.
|
|
Berethor
Scholar
<Borat> High Five! </Borat>
Posts: 381
|
Post by Berethor on May 18, 2007 8:46:56 GMT -5
Meh...whatever. The game looked like crap on the Original Xbox, a system that has better graphics than the Wii...i don't even want to know what it's going to look like on the Wii...
|
|
|
|
Post by yogurtfresh on May 26, 2007 14:03:21 GMT -5
are you another one of those typical wii haters? the wii has better graphics then the xbox, i have both side by side in my room. all systems go in my oppinion but the wii is not a bod console.
|
|
|
|
Post by Über on May 27, 2007 12:37:33 GMT -5
All the systems were great, literally. Except for the Dreamcast. That was only okay. And he's right, the Wii has better graphics. It's not exactly the most intelligent thing to do, put worse graphics on a system that's newer, unless it's a handheld against a console.
|
|
|
|
Post by yogurtfresh on May 28, 2007 13:00:20 GMT -5
exactly, it maks no sense. plus the wii can tell you the weather.  |
|
|
|
Post by Über on May 28, 2007 19:02:14 GMT -5
AND NEWS.
With proper intarwebs connections.
:B
|
|
|
|
Post by yogurtfresh on May 29, 2007 5:46:17 GMT -5
oh dear another rape and murder.
but it will be sunny outside with just a spell of rain!
|
|
|
|
Post by Drago Goldenwing on May 29, 2007 10:52:09 GMT -5
The Wii was not meant to be a polygon-pushing 5/700 dollar monster. Nintendo has consistently released next-gen consoles that focus on delivering solid games over the bells-and-whistles of the competitors. The GC/Wii could handle games that looked just as great as their competitors (I DEFY you to play Resident Evil 0 on the Gamecube and tell me that the GC couldn't handle graphics,) and did so at a price that was /very/ attractive to the average gamer thanks to Nintendo's decisions to ignore things like DVD and CD/MP3 compatability in favor of packing a lot of /system/ into the case.
That said, the Wii is still just as much of a badass in the graphics department as the other two, and once more adult-oriented games come out (Games not graphiced for the young,) we'll be seeing that. Just like we did for the GC.
And do /not/ insult the Dreamcast. I cried the day I heard Sega was getting out of the console business. The Dreamcast was an excellent system that was years ahead of its time, and only poor advertising and lack of effort on the part of retail outlets to move their hardware doomed the console.
And the Sega Dreamcast is not a /was/. They are still being sold by Sega of Japan through their website, fairly popular third-party games are still being released in Japan, and Sega brought up free Phantasy Star Online servers in Japan for people who wanted to continue playing the Dreamcast version. Granted the servers were closed this past April, and Sega's being arseclowns and refuse to turn the software over to other companies for official servers to be brought online again, but that's not the point I'm making; The DC is still so popular that Sega of Japan offered free online services for it that lasted well into /this/ year.
|
|
Berethor
Scholar
<Borat> High Five! </Borat>
Posts: 381
|
Post by Berethor on Jun 5, 2007 8:40:53 GMT -5
From what I have heard, the Wii's HD output peaks at 480p, while the Original Xbox peaks at 720p, the 360 peaks at 1080i(or p) and the PS3 peaks at 1080p.
If you think Wii games look better, compare them to The Chronicles of Riddick: Escape From Butcher Bay or Splinter Cell: Chaos Theory, or almost any of the more recent games released for the Original Xbox. You'll see that the Xbox is more graphically capable than the Wii. Don't compare Wii games with early games like Halo or Turok.
EDIT: No, I'm noy a "Wii hater." I like the Wii. If anything, I'm a PS3 hater.
|
|
|
|
Post by yogurtfresh on Jun 5, 2007 13:01:46 GMT -5
gasp. say that with sarcasm. anyways, as i say all systems go. why hate ps3, and if the wii can deliver good graphics like that with onlly the 400 or so output then imagine what the next nintendo consol will be like. sixaxis has been used on gameboys before ps3 got it!
|
|
